Soleymani Mahdi; Zia Hashemi; Ali Reza Mohseni Tabrizi; Houshang Nayebi
Volume 17, Issue 39 , June 2018, , Pages 9-32
Abstract
Youth as a social, cultural and biological structure is the basis and groundwork for social changes.Therefore, due to the increasing growth of the rethinking of sexual interactions as well as the increase of inter-gender interactions and changes in its form and content, the purpose of this study was ...
Read More
Youth as a social, cultural and biological structure is the basis and groundwork for social changes.Therefore, due to the increasing growth of the rethinking of sexual interactions as well as the increase of inter-gender interactions and changes in its form and content, the purpose of this study was to investigate the most important factors affecting the rethinking of sexual interactions of young people. The statistical population of the study included students from 18 to 29 years old at universities in Tehran. Sampling was done using multi-stage cluster sampling. The sample size was 384 according to Cochran's formula. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The findings of this study showed that there was a significant relationship between Filiarchy, long-term residence of young people in the family, individualism, the use of new communication technologies, the role of women and men, and the socioeconomic status with the amount of rethinking of sexual interactions. The findings of stepwise regression showed that modern communication technologies, individualism, change in the role of women and men, social and economic status, and childbirth, in total involve 18.3% of the variance in the rethinking of sexual interactions of young people. Using the structural equation model of Amos, it was found that changes in the image of a husband and wife through childbearing and individualism, as well as the use of new communication technologies, and the socio-economic base affect the level of rethinking in sexual interactions.
Reza Karim; Ali Reza Mohseni Tabrizi; Mehrdad Navabakhsh
Volume 15, Issue 33 , December 2017, , Pages 9-44
Abstract
This study examined the sociological explanation of youth participation, causes, forms and challenges. In order to achieve this goal through a variety of variables that affect youth participation, variables of social trust, social alienation, social apathy, the use of media and economic status- social ...
Read More
This study examined the sociological explanation of youth participation, causes, forms and challenges. In order to achieve this goal through a variety of variables that affect youth participation, variables of social trust, social alienation, social apathy, the use of media and economic status- social were selected as independent variables. Theoretical Foundations of variables and parameters of this study were on the base of Melvin Seaman, Limpest, Parsons, Giddens, Inglehart and zetompka theories.
The research methodology was survey and data gathering tool was a questionnaire with the reliability and credibility. Statistical population were 18-29 year old young people in 22 districts of Tehran in 1394. The sample number was 390 based on multi-stage cluster sampling method and Cochran formula. The main methods of data analysis were regression and path analysis.
On the base of the results, there were partnership between variables and social trust, social alienation, mass media, indifference, social and economic and social base and gender, but there were no significant relationship between the variables of marital status and participation.
Also, there was a significant relationship between variables and social trust, social alienation, mass media, social indifference, economic and social base and gender, but there was no significant relationship between the marital status and the participation.
Among the studied variables, social trust was of the strongest relationship to the the dependent variable of participation (social, political, cultural, economic and psychological).
The Multivariate regressions suggests that independent variables explain % 35 of "social participation" dependent variable changes, % 41 of "political participation"dependent variable changes, % 32 of "cultural cooperation"dependent variable changes, % 28 of "economic cooperation" dependent variable changes and % 25 of "the involvement of mental" dependent variable changes.
