asghar gholami; Farshad Emami; saeed Amirnejad; jamshid sayarnejad
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a model of optimal governance in the structure of national championship sports. The research method is qualitative and based on data theorizing of the foundation. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to collect information and data ...
Read More
The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a model of optimal governance in the structure of national championship sports. The research method is qualitative and based on data theorizing of the foundation. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to collect information and data analysis was performed by Strauss and Corbin method and paradigm model. The statistical population of the study includes people with a history of management at the level of senior management of the country, experts and sports policy makers, professors of sports management who had articles or writings in the field of research that the opinions of 15 experts to reach theoretical saturation in full Unlikely and selected using theoretical targeted techniques and snowballs. The reliability of the interviews was 0.82 by intra-subject agreement study. A total of 214 conceptual propositions were created from open source and 12 axes from the process of communication between codes and 10 selected codes to develop the main phenomenon. The results showed ten factors of stable structure, equitable structure, democratic structure, network communication, structural homogeneity, strategic direction development, participatory decision-making, evaluation and monitoring, systemic perspective, supportive structure on the structure of national championship sports. has it. Therefore, it is proposed to document the governance structure based on the democratic process, employee participation in decision-making, coherence of decision-making of three government institutions, the private sector and the people, participation of non-governmental organizations in decision-making, delegation based on differences in power. Accept.