Sajjad Haji Zadeh; Masoud NaderianJahromi; محسن NoghaniDokht Bahmani; Hamid Reza Mirsafian; Mahmood Rasouli Harzand; Hamid Janani
Volume 19, Issue 50 , March 2021, , Pages 149-172
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine various studies aimed at socializing via sports participation through a systematic review of the evidence. In this study, all published internal and external papers after 2000 related to socialization through sports participation were analyzed. In the initial search ...
Read More
This study was conducted to examine various studies aimed at socializing via sports participation through a systematic review of the evidence. In this study, all published internal and external papers after 2000 related to socialization through sports participation were analyzed. In the initial search of a total of 10938 research papers in internal and external bases, the articles that were included in the study were evaluated in terms of quality using the checklist, 42 articles were cited and categorized in the context of socialization through sports participation and entered the data analysis stage. The results showed most of the internal studies were centered on Tehran, and foreign studies were conducted with the focus of the United States, Turkey, Netherlands and Romania. The amount of attention to research on socialization has increased in internal papers from 1390 and in foreign articles since 2010. Many researchers have written their article according to the symbolic reciprocal viewpoint, and the largest statistical population of the research was the students. Research results showed that important factors such as family, school institution, systematic propaganda of public and private media, religious institution, government policies, available facilities and economic and social base in sporting system participation have been affected. Finally, it can be concluded that the absence of an appropriate pattern in the context of socialization through sport in internal and external studies is more than ever felt by many social groups that many scholars need to pay attention to this subject matter.
Mahmood Rasouli Harzand; Hamid Janani
Volume 19, Issue 49 , December 2020, , Pages 163-176
Abstract
The study is to compare the motivations of the fans in Tabriz Municipality and Urmia Municipality volleyball clubs. The research method is descriptive comparative and the information was gathered by field method. The research population for each team separately included 384 cases and the total number ...
Read More
The study is to compare the motivations of the fans in Tabriz Municipality and Urmia Municipality volleyball clubs. The research method is descriptive comparative and the information was gathered by field method. The research population for each team separately included 384 cases and the total number of 700 which were randomly selected. The measuring instrument was a questionnaire (Nazari, 1391) which the face and content validity were confirmed by experts and its reliability through Cronbach’s alpha test was %86. To analyze the data, U Mann-Whitney, U test and Friedman test were used. The results showed that there is a significant difference in fans support incentives of the two teams as the incentives of Urmia’s team was more than of Tabriz. Besides, there is a significant difference in support incentives (Collective pride, team affiliation, depending on the player, depending on the sport, lawyers, aesthetic and ethnic identity) of the two teams as the collective pride and ethnic identity of fans of Tabriz Municipality was more than that of Urmia Municipality, but in other factors Urmia was higher. Support incentives of Tabriz fans from high to low are: Collective pride, ethnic identity, aesthetic, depending on the sport, lawyers, depending on the player and depending on the sport. Support incentives of Urmia fans from high to low are: lawyers, depending on the sport, aesthetic, depending on the player, team affiliation, Collective pride and ethnic identity.